Behold, the third time I am ready to come to you; and I will not be burdensome to you: for I seek not your's, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children.
Behold, the third time I am ready to come to you; and I will not be burdensome to you: for I seek not your's, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children. Paul announces his third planned visit (previous: founding visit Acts 18:1-11; "painful visit" 2:1). He maintains his policy: I will not be burdensome—refusing financial support. But now he explains the pastoral motivation: I seek not your's, but you (ou gar zētō ta hymōn alla hymas, οὐ γὰρ ζητῶ τὰ ὑμῶν ἀλλὰ ὑμᾶς)—not your possessions but yourselves.
The analogy is tender: children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children. Paul positions himself as spiritual father (1 Corinthians 4:15, "I have begotten you through the gospel") who sacrifices for his children's welfare, not extracting resources from them. This inverts mercenary ministry: true pastors give sacrificially; false teachers take exploitatively (cf. 2:17, "which corrupt the word of God"; 11:20, "if a man devour you").
The phrase captures gospel logic: God doesn't need our resources but desires relationship (Psalm 50:12-14). Likewise, pastoral ministry flowing from gospel priorities seeks people's hearts, not their wallets. Paul's financial independence demonstrated this gospel shape.
Historical Context
In Greco-Roman patronage culture, teachers, philosophers, and religious leaders expected payment—often exploiting followers financially. Paul's refusal to accept Corinthian support (while accepting Macedonian support, 11:8-9) was strategic: it prevented accusations of greed and demonstrated that gospel ministry seeks converts' welfare, not wealth. The false apostles' financial exploitation (11:20) made Paul's self-support even more crucial.
Questions for Reflection
How does "I seek not yours, but you" define the heart of pastoral ministry versus mercenary religious professionalism?
What does the parent-child analogy teach about the proper direction of sacrifice in ministry—leaders serving people versus people serving leaders' comfort?
How can contemporary church leaders balance biblical teaching on financial support for ministry (1 Timothy 5:17-18) with Paul's example of refusing support for gospel clarity?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
Behold, the third time I am ready to come to you; and I will not be burdensome to you: for I seek not your's, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children. Paul announces his third planned visit (previous: founding visit Acts 18:1-11; "painful visit" 2:1). He maintains his policy: I will not be burdensome—refusing financial support. But now he explains the pastoral motivation: I seek not your's, but you (ou gar zētō ta hymōn alla hymas, οὐ γὰρ ζητῶ τὰ ὑμῶν ἀλλὰ ὑμᾶς)—not your possessions but yourselves.
The analogy is tender: children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children. Paul positions himself as spiritual father (1 Corinthians 4:15, "I have begotten you through the gospel") who sacrifices for his children's welfare, not extracting resources from them. This inverts mercenary ministry: true pastors give sacrificially; false teachers take exploitatively (cf. 2:17, "which corrupt the word of God"; 11:20, "if a man devour you").
The phrase captures gospel logic: God doesn't need our resources but desires relationship (Psalm 50:12-14). Likewise, pastoral ministry flowing from gospel priorities seeks people's hearts, not their wallets. Paul's financial independence demonstrated this gospel shape.